Views of a Modern World

Everything else Rick writes

Why DNA privacy should not be on your radar today

January 22, 2013 by rickcolosimo Leave a Comment

The NYT headline, “Web Hunt for DNA Sequences Leaves Privacy Compromised,” blows this out of proportion. 

 Wired’s article “Scientists Discover How to Identify People From ‘Anonymous’ Genomes” is only slightly more helpful. The key issue here is not that the DNA sequence of the participants itself was itself a magic fingerprint, but that when that information was combined with other genetic information of other people (in some cases, probably including the study participant) disclosed elsewhere on other terms, then it was possible to find people.

Indeed, there’s nothing magical here that hasn’t been done far more invasively by traditional marketers collecting personal consumer data from different sources and aggregating it.  

So what’s the point of knowing who I am if you have my DNA sequence? There’s a mention in Wired of a teen finding the identity of his sperm donor father. In that case, the teen had his own DNA and the father had put his DNA on a genealogy-related website. Well, there you go. That’s like putting your picture on LinkedIn and being surprised when someone matches your high school yearbook photo to it.

Unfortunately*, neither of these articles explains, or even hypothesizes in any way why this is a horrible thing. The NYT suggests that “severe penalties could be instituted for those who invade the privacy of subjects.” Usually we identify harms before proposing penalties.

People who disclose information know, or should know, that others will use that information and almost certainly in combination. People who buy drug-related products with credit cards and surf drug-related websites should not be surprised when an employer decides they might be smoking pot. Target, as an example only — we should all be SURE that every business that sells to consumers does this, recently got some unexpected attention when its data mining practices revealed that Target knew a teenaged girl was pregnant before her father did. 

 

By the way, in response to this study, the PGP reminded participants that this is obviously not an issue for us and of the rationale for not trying to protect sequence data.

 

Disclaimer: my position on the value of deliberately destroying any privacy of my DNA sequences is on the record: I’ve volunteered for the Personal Genome Project and will volunteer the DNA of my two boys and as many family members as they will take. Research requires data.

Ignorance is submission. Knowledge is power. Action is dignity. 


  • Wordle tells me unfortunately is a word I use an awful lot. I’m not sure that’s a good thing. I note it  here for the record and won’t edit that one out of this post. I expect it won’t appear as often in future posts.

Filed Under: Soapbox Tagged With: genetics, privacy

Why does Verizon care where I’ve lived?

December 15, 2010 by rickcolosimo Leave a Comment

I saw a posting today for an inhouse commercial counsel at Verizon Wireless. This would be an interesting job, lots of commercial contracts, some domain specificity, and it’s not terribly far from home.

But I started filling out the online application (again asking for username and password — really? Why does my password to the job application webapp require at least one letter and number? Am I in danger of being hacked and losing all my data?) and got very quickly turned off. I filled out my address (since most such webapps are really just private label versions of third-party software, I assume that the software would later be able to read my resume and guess at my address — why make me type it at all upfront?). But there was an additional field asking how long I’d lived at that address. Okay, whatever, 1-2 years (I think I moved about 18 months ago).

And then a new field pops up — it asks me for SEVEN years of address history. WTF? I’ve never been asked about that length of time for where I’ve lived that didn’t involve a specific moral character inquiry (namely the three state bar exams I’ve taken) or a security clearance (entering the Army and becoming an officer with my old SECRET clearance).

Why the heck would they care about this? It sounds like a scheme to track down people who might owe them money but nevertheless are applying for jobs there. This theory reminds me, now that I think of it, of an article I read recently about Target/Wal-Mart finding that some large percentage, 10-20%, of job applicants had been tossed out of the store for shoplifting or similar problems — maybe Verizon’s on to something. I just know that I don’t want any part of it.

Filed Under: Soapbox Tagged With: privacy, rant

Search this site

Recent Posts

  • That Stupid FB Notice
  • Memorial Day 2020
  • House Rules
  • Lost Spring
  • Did not find

Follow me on Twitter

My Tweets

Tags

aba Add new tag Army autism biography blogging business model character cool culture customer data dating decisiveness economics fear finance humor language law leadership marketing military networking objective orphan Orphan ideas orphans personal politics privacy productivity quote quotes rant relationships right view soapbox software bounty tips tools wisdom workflow writing Zero-based

Copyright © 2021 · Diligent on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in